Skip to main content

Legal AI Summer: Big bets or hot air?

The legal market is considered conservative, but in the US and UK in particular, legal AI start-ups are currently springing up on a weekly basis – with high financing rounds.

In recent months, the following deals, among others, have made the headlines:

🔹 Harvey – $300 M (Series D) – OpenAI / LexisNexis – US Legal AI
🔹 Noxtua – €80 M (Series B) – CMS / Dentons / C.H. Beck – European ‘sovereign’ legal AI
🔹 Legora – $80 M – Y Combinator / Benchmark – Stockholm, ‘collaborative AI for lawyers’
🔹 EvenUp – $135 M (Series D) – Legal Workflow Automation
🔹 Wordsmith – $25 M – Edinburgh, Legal Agents for Inhouse Teams
🔹 Definely – $30 M (Series B) – London, Agentic AI for Lawyers
🔹 Flank – $10 M (Series A) – Berlin
🔹 Luminance – $75 M (Series C) – Slaughter and May
🔹 Ravical – €7.3 M (Pre Seed) – Lakestar – Legal AI Agents
🔹 Vertice – $50 M (Series C) – Lakestar – Procurement / Spend Mgmt

💭 Is this capital well invested – or a risky bet?

On closer inspection, many of these start-ups simply rely on existing large language models (LLMs) and add a fancy user interface or workflow engine on top. This can offer added value, but is ultimately easier to replace as soon as a competitor taps into the same API.

I don’t play in the above-mentioned financing league myself, but I regularly receive pitch decks from legal tech founders who are building convincing solutions with significantly less capital. As an Alex Hormozi-fan and a bootstrapper, I therefore often ask myself:

Why do you still need 80 million to automate legal work today?

Especially when top legal AI solutions are already available – without VC money:
👉 Agents, chatbots, assistants, document stores, legal workflows – all developed owner-funded without US LLMs or hyperscaler clouds, hosted nicely sovereign in Europe.

What do you think? 🔥

Comments

Close Menu

Let’s chase legal dinos!

A world of new law. Together.